reports say the MGM is no longer running the 0.50/1 game on the strip, it looks like bill's is back to the cheapest game in town
No sir .... Bill's remains one of the most expensive games in town as it has the standard Harrah's rake (I'm not used to calling it Caesars). It does however have the lowest blinds in town. But blinds are not the cost of the game.
_________________ If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -- George Orwell
never really been sure why, but ive found winning far easier in $1-2 games around town than 50c-1 at bills. seems to be a lot of daily grinders at bills. and the rake is higher there. ive done better when ive played at bills LESS. i got frustrated tonite stuck $18 and then lost the whole $100 trying to push a guy off the pot i thought couldnt call.
reports say the MGM is no longer running the 0.50/1 game on the strip, it looks like bill's is back to the cheapest game in town
No sir .... Bill's remains one of the most expensive games in town as it has the standard Harrah's rake (I'm not used to calling it Caesars). It does however have the lowest blinds in town. But blinds are not the cost of the game.
reports say the MGM is no longer running the 0.50/1 game on the strip, it looks like bill's is back to the cheapest game in town
No sir .... Bill's remains one of the most expensive games in town as it has the standard Harrah's rake (I'm not used to calling it Caesars). It does however have the lowest blinds in town. But blinds are not the cost of the game.
But not if the average pot size is smaller ...
if the average pot size is smaller, the rake will hurt u far more.
reports say the MGM is no longer running the 0.50/1 game on the strip, it looks like bill's is back to the cheapest game in town
No sir .... Bill's remains one of the most expensive games in town as it has the standard Harrah's rake (I'm not used to calling it Caesars). It does however have the lowest blinds in town. But blinds are not the cost of the game.
But not if the average pot size is smaller ...
If i go to the supermarket to buy a can of coffee and one can has 12 oz. and costs $3.99 and the another can has 16 oz. and costs $4.99 which one is cheaper?
You could say the first is cheaper because the absolute price is $1 less. But you are getting less and the price of the second is less expensive when you compare the cost per oz.
same thing applies here.
_________________ If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. -- George Orwell
If i go to the supermarket to buy a can of coffee and one can has 12 oz. and costs $3.99 and the another can has 16 oz. and costs $4.99 which one is cheaper?
You could say the first is cheaper because the absolute price is $1 less. But you are getting less and the price of the second is less expensive when you compare the cost per oz.
same thing applies here.
Errr ... No.
The 12oz can is cheaper. The 16oz is better value.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 2 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
